|
Our Destiny Lies NOT in Tax Trickery
By Dr. Don Racheter
The
recent overwhelming rejection (15% for, 85% against[1])
of “Project Destiny” by the voters of three central Iowa counties
(Dallas, Polk, and Warren) is further evidence that taxpayers do not
appreciate politicians, bureaucrats, and other elites trying to
manipulate and deceive them. Project Destiny involved an attempt to
raise the sales tax in these communities by 17% (from six to seven cents
on the dollar) and use the proceeds for cultural attractions like bike
paths, the zoo, and botanical center as well as unspecified “capital
improvements,” “debt relief,” and “property tax relief” by the local
governments in the three counties.[2]
A special
“Yes to Destiny” committee was formed to promote the tax increase and
reportedly raised and spent over $750,000 on their effort, while the “No
to Destiny” opposition only raised and spent around $7,000. [3]
The head of the opposition group, George Davey, explained the very
disparate results of the 99 to 1 spending disadvantage by saying "When
you're peddling facts against fiction, you get a lot of bang for your
buck!"[4]
One opponent alleged that the “Yes to Deceit” campaign put out brochures
that trumpeted the projected property tax reductions without ever
mentioning they would be funded by the sales tax increase.[5]
Since
everyone pays sales taxes, including poor and working Iowans, while only
those who own property get a break when property taxes are lowered, and
those who own large amounts of property get the largest breaks, it was
not surprising that labor unions and other groups that champion the poor
and working class joined the tax groups in opposition to Project
Destiny. [6]
Government leaders who were championing the plan were not as credible
because of recent failures by school officials to spend money raised by
a tax increase as promised and because of the Central Iowa Employment
and Training Consortium (CIETC) scandal.[7]
Many taxpayers also suspected the promised property tax relief would be
a sham. What one pays in property tax is a multiplication of the
millage rate times the assessed valuation of the property, so even if
the tax rate is reduced, if the assessed value of the property is
increased, the taxpayer may end up paying as much, or even more, from
the supposed “tax cut.” Having seen this ploy played out time and again
by government officials, taxpayers were understandably suspicious of how
much, if any, benefit they would actually receive from the Project
Destiny plan.
We have seen many instances where Iowans have voted by over 60% to
approve increased taxation for bonds to construct a new elementary
school in a district with increased enrollment when officials have made
a case with the facts. However, when leaders try to “pull a fast one,”
or are perceived as doing so, as happened with Yes to Destiny, taxpayers
are quick to use their constitutional protection of the right to vote on
increasing their taxes to “just say NO.” It is vital that we not give
up this right to vote on sales tax increases, bond issues, and other
proposed tax increases as has been proposed in the Iowa Legislature by
the Iowa Association of School Boards.[8]
Dr. Don Racheter is President of Public Interest Institute (PII)
and a member of the Board of Directors of Tax Education Foundation.
The views expressed herein are those of the author and not
necessarily those of PII or Tax Education Foundation.
They are brought to you in the interest of a better-informed
citizenry.
|